Showing 4201 - 4210 of 4312 for "Intellectual property" with applied filters
Filters:
02 July 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
Taiwan’s Council of Grand Justices issued Interpretation No 761 on February 9 2018, addressing the issue of whether or not judges and technical examiners at the Intellectual Property Court (hereinafter referred to as IP Court) are obliged to abide by Article 19.3 of the law on administrative litigation.
In FIL Ltd & Anor v Fidelis Underwriting Ltd & Ors [2018] EWHC 1097 (Pat), it was held that use of FIDELIS for insurance underwriting does not infringe FIDELITY for insurance or financial services.
The Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act (UCPA) was recently amended, and the updates to the act will be implemented on July 18 2018.
Denim giant Levi Strauss & Co has recently won a trade mark infringement case against Dutch retail chain Hema concerning its famous V-shaped stitching on the back pockets of its jeans.
CRISPR technology enables genes to be edited and can eventually treat diseases caused by gene mutations.
02 July 2018 by Editha Hechanova
All government agencies such as the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL) are directed to promote the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in resolving disputes and cases.
29 June 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
Managing Intellectual Property's list of highly recommended in-house IP counsel for 2018 revealed
19 June 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
The Association of Intellectual Property Firms (AIPF) invites you to its Annual Meeting in Chicago, Illinois, on September 26 - 28
01 June 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
It has become common practice for parties of any administrative proceeding to ask the Institute of Industrial Property to require a third party, not related to the proceeding, or even its counterpart, to respond to several questions raised by the offeror of the proof.
One of the two IP courts of Istanbul rejected a crucial precautionary injunction (PI) demand of a patent owner on the ground that the demand requires a full trial due to the pending invalidation action against the relevant patent.
