Showing 7131 - 7140 of 7186 for "Trade mark" with applied filters
Filters:
01 September 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
Starbucks coffeehouses can be found in myriad regions of the globe. However, Starbucks’ trajectory in Russia has not been easy.
01 September 2018 by Karen Artz Ash
In the last few years, the US Supreme Court has held that laches is not an available defense to claims for copyright or patent infringement brought within the limited periods described under each of the Copyright and Patent Acts
01 September 2018 by Norton Rose Fulbright
Big names in Hollywood, sports, and music often enforce their personality rights
01 September 2018 by Spoor & Fisher
On June 28 2018 the Zimbabwean authorities published a document entitled the Zimbabwe Intellectual Property Policy and Implementation Strategy.
01 September 2018 by GoldenGate Lawyers
Bad faith trade mark registrations are a persistent problem encountered by foreign companies in China. It is reported that large-scale bad faith trade mark registrations have created an industry for numerous Chinese individuals and companies.
01 September 2018 by ABE & Partners
The Japanese IP system has vulnerable evidence collection procedures in comparison with foreign countries.
01 September 2018 by Editha Hechanova
About 47% of the land area of the Philippines is devoted to agriculture. The agriculture sector can be divided into four groups: farming, fisheries, livestock, and forestry.
31 August 2018 by Özge Atilgan Karakulak
Özge Atılgan Karakulak and Güldeniz Doğan Alkan of Gün + Partners examine the advantages and disadvantages of TÜRKSMD, a new company set up by the Turkish IP Office to value intellectual property rights
08 August 2018 by Lucy Songi
In the latest Managing IP Women in IP Interview series, Lucy Songi interviewed Astrid Gérard (Preu Bohlig & Partners), Sandra Pohlman (df-mp), Christine Kanz (Hoyng Rokh Monegier) and Cordula Schumacher (Arnold Ruess) about initiatives in Germany to address gender inequality at the workplace
02 July 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
In the case of Christian Louboutin SAS v Abubaker & Ors, a single judge of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court summarily dismissed a trade mark infringement and passing off suit on May 18 2018, without issuing summons to the defendants, holding that use of a single colour rather than a combination of colours does not qualify as a mark under Section 2(1)(m) and as a trade mark under Section 2(1)(zb) of the Trademarks Act 1999 (hereinafter the Act).
