Showing 4951 - 4960 of 5083 for "Intellectual property" with applied filters
Filters:
01 September 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
Starbucks coffeehouses can be found in myriad regions of the globe. However, Starbucks’ trajectory in Russia has not been easy.
Resolution Chemicals v AstraZeneca B.V. and Shionogi (Supreme Court of The Netherlands, The Hague, June 8 2018) deals with the extent of the protection that is conferred by patent EP0521471 (EP 471), for rosuvastatin, a new cholesterol inhibitor.
When evaluating bad faith claims, the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office (TPTO) considers several matters , but predominantly if the trade mark is an original sign that was created by a prior right holder.
Ten years ago the Austrian Supreme Court decided a case concerning Mazda and a tuning company. The tuning company had offered its chip tuning parts for a range of cars. It also named on its website the car types for which it offered these chips. For that it used the cars’ word marks and the figurative marks (logos).
01 September 2018 by FB Rice
It is a long-standing principle of Australian patent law that determining whether or not a patent application is directed towards patentable subject matter should be done separately to determining issues of novelty and inventive step.
01 September 2018 by Norton Rose Fulbright
Big names in Hollywood, sports, and music often enforce their personality rights
01 September 2018 by GoldenGate Lawyers
Bad faith trade mark registrations are a persistent problem encountered by foreign companies in China. It is reported that large-scale bad faith trade mark registrations have created an industry for numerous Chinese individuals and companies.
31 August 2018 by Özge Atilgan Karakulak
Özge Atılgan Karakulak and Güldeniz Doğan Alkan of Gün + Partners examine the advantages and disadvantages of TÜRKSMD, a new company set up by the Turkish IP Office to value intellectual property rights
31 August 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
The decision of the Full Federal Court in GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Consumer Healthcare Investments (Ireland) (No 2) Limited v Generic Partners Pty Limited (2018) FCAFC 71 (May 10 2018) indicates that a mistake in a claim cannot be ignored even where the skilled person understands that a mistake has been made.
15 August 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
Managing Intellectual Property will launch its research for the 2019 edition of IP STARS on September 3 2018.
