Showing 1381 - 1390 of 1411 for "ITC litigation" with applied filters
13 November 2018 by
Firm gains post-grant proceedings specialist in Orange County
31 October 2018 by
This roundup includes Nelson Mullins Broad and Cassel, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, Venable, Kacvinsky Daisak Bluni, Oblon, Shearman & Sterling, Alessandri, Maucher Jenkins, Hoyng Rokh Monegier, AWA, Venner Shipley, Mewburn Ellis, Page White and Farrer, Bird & Bird, Dittmar & Indrenius, Mathys & Squire, Baker McKenzie Habib Al Mulla, and Simone Intellectual Property Services Asia (SIPS).
21 September 2018 by
Managing Intellectual Property hosted a well-attended webinar yesterday to provide information about IP STARS and the research for the 2019 edition. Questions from attendees were also answered.
01 September 2018 by
At last, Germany has clear guidelines regarding the litigation value of an appeal to the German Federal High Court of Justice (BGH)
01 September 2018 by
In a judgment dated July 12 2018, the Delhi High Court has allowed a plea of patent infringement by Koninklijke Philips Electronics (Phillips)
01 September 2018 by
The Japanese IP system has vulnerable evidence collection procedures in comparison with foreign countries.
01 September 2018 by
Early this year, the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property issued decisions denying registration for the trade mark PINCHE GRINGO BBQ & Design in classes 43 (restaurants) and 30 (sauces)
01 September 2018 by
Big names in Hollywood, sports, and music often enforce their personality rights
02 July 2018 by
Shionogi is the owner of a patent entitled Pyrimidine Derivatives (JP2648897). X filed a request for a trial for invalidation of the patent. Nippon Chemiphar intervened in the trial as a plaintiff, and AstraZeneca UK intervened in the trial in order to support the defendant.
02 July 2018 by
Although it is the general policy of the USPTO’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to suspend opposition proceedings when the parties to such proceedings become involved in a civil action which may be dispositive of the case, a recent decision issued by the US District Court for the District of Delaware in Tigercat Int’l, Inc. v Caterpillar Inc. indicates that there are circumstances where, conversely, federal courts will stay a litigation pending a TTAB ruling.