Showing 4971 - 4980 of 5083 for "Intellectual property" with applied filters
02 July 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
In Mexico, droit moral is attached to the author and is inalienable, does not expire, cannot be waived and cannot be encumbered. The author and his/her heirs can enforce this right.
02 July 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
Taiwan’s Council of Grand Justices issued Interpretation No 761 on February 9 2018, addressing the issue of whether or not judges and technical examiners at the Intellectual Property Court (hereinafter referred to as IP Court) are obliged to abide by Article 19.3 of the law on administrative litigation.
02 July 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
In FIL Ltd & Anor v Fidelis Underwriting Ltd & Ors [2018] EWHC 1097 (Pat), it was held that use of FIDELIS for insurance underwriting does not infringe FIDELITY for insurance or financial services.
02 July 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
When pursuing an IP enforcement case in Vietnam, counsel will often inform rights holders about the need to obtain a VIPRI opinion as a first step.
02 July 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
The Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act (UCPA) was recently amended, and the updates to the act will be implemented on July 18 2018.
02 July 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
Denim giant Levi Strauss & Co has recently won a trade mark infringement case against Dutch retail chain Hema concerning its famous V-shaped stitching on the back pockets of its jeans.
02 July 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
CRISPR technology enables genes to be edited and can eventually treat diseases caused by gene mutations.
29 June 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
Managing Intellectual Property's list of highly recommended in-house IP counsel for 2018 revealed
19 June 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
The Association of Intellectual Property Firms (AIPF) invites you to its Annual Meeting in Chicago, Illinois, on September 26 - 28
01 June 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
It has become common practice for parties of any administrative proceeding to ask the Institute of Industrial Property to require a third party, not related to the proceeding, or even its counterpart, to respond to several questions raised by the offeror of the proof.