Showing 5781 - 5790 of 5806 for "United Kingdom (England)" with applied filters
Filters:
01 September 2018 by Karen Artz Ash
In the last few years, the US Supreme Court has held that laches is not an available defense to claims for copyright or patent infringement brought within the limited periods described under each of the Copyright and Patent Acts
31 August 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
The decision of the Full Federal Court in GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Consumer Healthcare Investments (Ireland) (No 2) Limited v Generic Partners Pty Limited (2018) FCAFC 71 (May 10 2018) indicates that a mistake in a claim cannot be ignored even where the skilled person understands that a mistake has been made.
04 July 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
Meet with start-up founders, entrepreneurs, investors, corporate and brand executives, and thought leaders at unbound London festival
02 July 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
In FIL Ltd & Anor v Fidelis Underwriting Ltd & Ors [2018] EWHC 1097 (Pat), it was held that use of FIDELIS for insurance underwriting does not infringe FIDELITY for insurance or financial services.
02 July 2018 by Sybille Pfender
At the end of April 2018, Advocate General (AG) Wathelet handed down an advisory opinion regarding the first of three recent referrals to the CJEU (C-121/17). This concerns the interpretation of Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009.
02 July 2018 by Karen Artz Ash
Although it is the general policy of the USPTO’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to suspend opposition proceedings when the parties to such proceedings become involved in a civil action which may be dispositive of the case, a recent decision issued by the US District Court for the District of Delaware in Tigercat Int’l, Inc. v Caterpillar Inc. indicates that there are circumstances where, conversely, federal courts will stay a litigation pending a TTAB ruling.
01 June 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property
The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) has an objective to provide quick and cost-effective IP litigation. It has proved to be popular.
01 June 2018 by Karen Artz Ash
The US Supreme Court’s ruling in B&B Hardware, Inc v Hargis Industries, Inc provided that courts were obligated to give preclusive effect to decisions made by the US Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) if the ordinary elements of issue preclusion are met
14 May 2018 by Kingsley Egbuonu
This roundup features Antequera Parilli & Rodriguez, Arochi & Lindner, Bardehle Pagenberg, DWF, FisherBroyles, HGF, J A Kemp, Kirkland & Ellis, Lewis Silkin, Marks & Clerk, Pinsent Masons and Santarelli
02 April 2018 by Kingsley Egbuonu
This roundup features Awapatent, Covington & Burling, Dentons, EIP, Eversheds Sutherland, Gowling WLG, Hoyng Rokh Monegier, Mewburn Ellis, Pinsent Masons, Reddie & Grose, Spruson & Ferguson and Véron & Associés
