Showing 1351 - 1360 of 1390 for "District of Columbia" with applied filters
23 November 2018 by
Ilya Kazi and Miranda Kent of Mathys & Squire analyse the changes to the EPO’s opposition procedure and suggest ways in which businesses can align their strategy with the current legal tools available
31 October 2018 by
This roundup includes Nelson Mullins Broad and Cassel, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, Venable, Kacvinsky Daisak Bluni, Oblon, Shearman & Sterling, Alessandri, Maucher Jenkins, Hoyng Rokh Monegier, AWA, Venner Shipley, Mewburn Ellis, Page White and Farrer, Bird & Bird, Dittmar & Indrenius, Mathys & Squire, Baker McKenzie Habib Al Mulla, and Simone Intellectual Property Services Asia (SIPS).
29 October 2018 by
The EPO has issued new Guidelines for Examination covering a range of issues such as the removal or replacement of a feature in a claim, inventive step attacks in oppositions and summons to oral proceedings. Tom Hamer and Alexander Korenberg of Kilburn & Strode assess whether applicants will welcome the changes
04 October 2018 by
On September 27 2018 WIPO announced Peru’s accession to the Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks. Peru is the first Latin American country to ratify the treaty
17 September 2018 by
Giovana Palacios and Adriana Barrera of BARLAW-Barrera & Asociados analyse the changes implemented by Legislative Decree No 1391.
01 September 2018 by
Big names in Hollywood, sports, and music often enforce their personality rights
01 September 2018 by
In Taiwan, both invention and design applications are subject to substantive examination.
01 September 2018 by
Ten years ago the Austrian Supreme Court decided a case concerning Mazda and a tuning company. The tuning company had offered its chip tuning parts for a range of cars. It also named on its website the car types for which it offered these chips. For that it used the cars’ word marks and the figurative marks (logos).
01 September 2018 by
In a judgment dated July 12 2018, the Delhi High Court has allowed a plea of patent infringement by Koninklijke Philips Electronics (Phillips)
01 September 2018 by
Resolution Chemicals v AstraZeneca B.V. and Shionogi (Supreme Court of The Netherlands, The Hague, June 8 2018) deals with the extent of the protection that is conferred by patent EP0521471 (EP 471), for rosuvastatin, a new cholesterol inhibitor.